<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Delevan on Ibec</title>
	<link>http://www.sineadgleeson.com/blog/2006/08/22/richard-delevan-on-ibec/</link>
	<description>Sinéad Gleeson's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: colink</title>
		<link>http://www.sineadgleeson.com/blog/2006/08/22/richard-delevan-on-ibec/#comment-13957</link>
		<dc:creator>colink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sineadgleeson.com/blog/2006/08/22/richard-delevan-on-ibec/#comment-13957</guid>
		<description>'It is the creative destruction at the heart of capitalism, made flesh. It is corrosive to traditional authority and hierarchy. Its organising principle is irony. It revels in sex and music and argument and money and sportand laughter. It is seductive and insatiable. It is glorious to behold. It is young'

Nothing new there but lets not fool ourselves, the heart of capitalism will survive this years model of teenager as it has survived every previous model since it invented them. Itâ€™s an interesting link Sinead- thanks for that because itâ€™s the sort of thing Iâ€™d have missed: with the near constant advertising we all endure everyday, I find it's hard to muster an interest in anything to do with the whole marketing/ advertising sphere.  Iâ€™ll have to weigh in with James R above though that we have heard all of this before, even down to the familiar co-opting of emergent technologies. The original article makes several very good points (and any kicking of Ibec is to be supported) but Iâ€™m not convinced this is a major skirmish in an â€˜inter-generational culture warâ€™,  I would have thought that this was a constant state; combatants and technologies come and go but the culture clash goes on, gets co-opted, recharges a few years later and somewhere in all of that weâ€™ll get the odd good song, the odd good novel, and the occasional bit of useful technology for those of us squarely located between the technology-hipsters and the Luddites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;It is the creative destruction at the heart of capitalism, made flesh. It is corrosive to traditional authority and hierarchy. Its organising principle is irony. It revels in sex and music and argument and money and sportand laughter. It is seductive and insatiable. It is glorious to behold. It is young&#8217;</p>
<p>Nothing new there but lets not fool ourselves, the heart of capitalism will survive this years model of teenager as it has survived every previous model since it invented them. Itâ€™s an interesting link Sinead- thanks for that because itâ€™s the sort of thing Iâ€™d have missed: with the near constant advertising we all endure everyday, I find it&#8217;s hard to muster an interest in anything to do with the whole marketing/ advertising sphere.  Iâ€™ll have to weigh in with James R above though that we have heard all of this before, even down to the familiar co-opting of emergent technologies. The original article makes several very good points (and any kicking of Ibec is to be supported) but Iâ€™m not convinced this is a major skirmish in an â€˜inter-generational culture warâ€™,  I would have thought that this was a constant state; combatants and technologies come and go but the culture clash goes on, gets co-opted, recharges a few years later and somewhere in all of that weâ€™ll get the odd good song, the odd good novel, and the occasional bit of useful technology for those of us squarely located between the technology-hipsters and the Luddites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.sineadgleeson.com/blog/2006/08/22/richard-delevan-on-ibec/#comment-13919</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sineadgleeson.com/blog/2006/08/22/richard-delevan-on-ibec/#comment-13919</guid>
		<description>Rupert Murdoch's News Corp only bought MySpace in 2005 for $580 million dollars when it had already been in existence for two years.  When it started it was one of the first social networking sites and it was revolutionary in the way it allowed people to interact and in the way it has encouraged users to customise and alter the code to suit themselves.  It's not cool or revolutionary now - NewsCorp pretty much killed that - but it was when it started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s News Corp only bought MySpace in 2005 for $580 million dollars when it had already been in existence for two years.  When it started it was one of the first social networking sites and it was revolutionary in the way it allowed people to interact and in the way it has encouraged users to customise and alter the code to suit themselves.  It&#8217;s not cool or revolutionary now - NewsCorp pretty much killed that - but it was when it started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dotsy</title>
		<link>http://www.sineadgleeson.com/blog/2006/08/22/richard-delevan-on-ibec/#comment-13860</link>
		<dc:creator>Dotsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sineadgleeson.com/blog/2006/08/22/richard-delevan-on-ibec/#comment-13860</guid>
		<description>How can a website like MySpace be considered revolutionary if it is owned by a multinational organisation like News International? I agree with James R that these technolgies while at first appearing to be emancipatory are in fact enslaving. It is about the extension of the domain of control into people's private lives, where friendship, sexual preference and taste can be recorded, categorised and commodified. The kids are alright? As product maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can a website like MySpace be considered revolutionary if it is owned by a multinational organisation like News International? I agree with James R that these technolgies while at first appearing to be emancipatory are in fact enslaving. It is about the extension of the domain of control into people&#8217;s private lives, where friendship, sexual preference and taste can be recorded, categorised and commodified. The kids are alright? As product maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
